Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper

Title of your project

Overview of Work Practice Area

RN to BSN students - Discuss your work practice area here. Are you in long-term or acute care settings? What is the size of your facility? How many beds in your unit? What is the typical patient population? How long do they stay? What is the typical nurse to patient ratio? How many nurses are on per shift? How many nursing assistants are on per shift? What is the role of the supervisor and the manager? Make sure that you are not writing in first person

A-BSN students – Discuss something that is of concern to you in a current clinical setting or something you are interested in learning more about in a future clinical experience Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper.

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

Overview of Topic

What is your topic of interest? Why is it of interest to you? Provide an example if possible of something related to your topic that makes this topic interesting to you.

RN to BSN students – Perhaps you have a high fall rate and are interested in learning ways to help lower the incidence of falls. Or maybe you are interested in introducing a new intervention into your practice setting. Maybe you work in the NICU and see a high population of babies born to addicted mothers and want to learn better ways to help those infants.

A-BSN students - You may be going to a critical care area and are interested in learning more about Ventilator Safety. Or maybe you are going to Maternity and are interested in water birth safety compared to c-section or vaginal delivery.

Population

What is the patient population that you are interested in? Be specific about age, gender, etc.

Maternity example – Pregnant women

ICU example – Patients requiring CPR

Infant – Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS)

Intervention

What is the intervention you are interested in learning more about?

Maternity example- Water births

ICU example – automated compression delivery machine

Infant – Breastfeeding and use of medication

Comparison

What are you comparing the new intervention to? Usually you are comparing something new to something that is already in place Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper.

Maternity example – vaginal delivery

ICU example – manual compressions

Infant – use of medication

Outcome

What is the outcome that you are hoping to prove with this new intervention?

Maternity example – Water births are safer and the women experience less pain during delivery.

ICU example – Improved neurologic function

Infant - decrease severity of symptoms within 4 weeks of life

PICO(T) Question

Does the use of water birth improve quality of delivery by decreasing pain during the delivery process compared with vaginal delivery experience?

In patients requiring who suffer VFib arrest, does the use of an automated compression delivery machine compared with manual compressions improve neurologic outcomes?

In infants with NAS, does utilizing methadone and breastfeeding, compared with methadone alone, decrease the severity of symptoms within 4 weeks of life.

Principle of Respect

Discuss the ethical principle of respect. How can this be integrated into your project?

Assurance of Autonomy

Discuss the ethical principle of autonomy. How will this be integrated into your project?

Beneficence

Discuss the ethical principle of beneficence. How will this be integrated into your project? Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper

Justice

Discuss the ethical principle of justice. How will this be integrated into your project?

Quantitative Study One

Tehrani, A., Farajzadegan, X., Rajabi, F., & Zamani, A. (2011). Belonging to a peer support group enhance the quality of life and adherence rate in patients affected by breast cancer: a non-randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Research in Medical Services, 16(5), 658-665. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214378/

The article presents the results of a quantitative study to evaluate the assertion that peer support groups enhanced quality of life and adherence among breast cancer patients. It acknowledges that meeting someone with similar experiences can be beneficial to breast cancer patients. To verify the assertion, the study compared the effects of education program and peer support on quality of life. Applying a controlled clinical trial approach, the study assigned participants to peer support in the experimental group and routine education program in the control group after which quality of life and adherence were evaluated. The results of the study showed that the vitality and mental health scored were significantly higher in the experimental group when compared to the control group (p<0.001) with no significant differences noted for adherence. The results show that belonging to a peer support group enhances the quality of life.

Type of Study

The article presented the results of a controlled clinical trial. In this case, the participants were assigned to experiment and control groups with all other variables controlled except for the two treatment approaches that were being compared. 68 participants were recruited, all between 20 and 65 years of age, and at either stage II or III of their cancer. Data on quality of life was collected using SF36 questionnaire. The collected data was then subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software version 18 that conducted Chi square test, paired sample t-test, independent t-test, MANCOVA, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Kolmo-gorov-Smirnov test. Given that the study sought to compare two treatment interventions, then it can be accepted to have been a clinical trial.

Threats to Internal and External Validity

A review of Tehrani et al. (2011) shows that there were two possible threats to the internal and external validity. The first threat is that any differences noted for the quality of life as the dependent variable were not attributed to the two interventions (peer support group and education program) as the independent variables. This threat was minimized by conducting the study in a controlled environment where all variables remained the same except for the independent variables that were being compared. The second threat is whether the conclusion was based on the collected data. This threat was minimized by aligning the conclusion with the results of the statistical analysis (Creswell, 2013)Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper. In this respect, the study protected both the internal and external validity.

Applicability

The present project intends to show that peer support groups can complement standard medical management approaches to improve the speed with which cancer patients’ resumes normal professional, personal and social life after diagnosis and during treatment. Tehrani et al. (2011) supports the project by showing that offering cancer patients peer support would complement medical management by improving their quality of life.

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

Quantitative Study Two

Taleghani, F., Babazadeh, S., Mosavi, S., & Tavazohi, H. (2012). The effects of peer support group on promoting quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 17(2 Suppl1): S125-S130. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3696969/

The article presents the results of a quantitative study to determine the effects of peer support group on promoting quality of life in patients with breast cancer. To determine the effect of support groups, the researchers recruited breast cancer patients from Tehran and Isfahan cities in Iran. Simple random sampling was then applied to assign the participants to control and case groups. The participants in the control group received standard care while those in the case group joined a peer support group in addition to the standard care. Quality of life scores were collected during and at the conclusion of the study. The results showed that although there were no differences in the physical dimensions of quality of life for the two groups, there were statistical differences in the mental and spiritual dimensions of the quality of life for the two groups (p<0.001) with those who attended peer support groups reporting better scores. The results show that breast cancer patients who attended peer support groups in addition to standard care enjoyed a better quality of life when compared to their counterparts who only received standard care Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper.

Type of Study

The article presented the results of a clinical trial. The methodology entailed identifying potential study participants then subjecting them to controlled conditions and treatment plans. In this case, the participants were identified and recruited from the two cities based on the inclusion criteria. Next, the participants were randomized into the control and case groups before those in the case group were subjected to peer support groups that were moderated by volunteers who had received training on the care modalities for breast cancer. The volunteers talked with the participants about their experiences but were not allowed to talk about the medical aspect of treatment. The quality of life scores were periodically recorded for the two groups. In this respect, the study was a clinical trial sought to determine the effectiveness of peer support groups as an intervention.

Threats to Internal and External Validity

A review of Taleghani et al. (2012) shows that there were two possible threats to the internal and external validity. The first threat was that there was a possibility that changes to the dependent variable were not attributed to the independent variable. This threat was minimized by conducting the study in a controlled environment whereby the only difference between the control and case groups was the treatment approach under review. The second threat was whether the study conclusion was correct and based on the collected data. The conclusion was based on the statistical results from the collected data (Creswell, 2013) Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper. As a result, the study protected both the internal and external validity.

Applicability

The project intends to show that peer support groups can complement standard medical management approaches to improve the speed with which cancer patients’ resumes normal professional, personal and social life after diagnosis and during treatment. Taleghani et al. (2012) supports the project by showing that patients who are supported by peer groups enjoyed higher quality of life in addition standard care when compared to their counterparts who only received standard care. This sentiments are aligned with the basis of the project by showing that the effective and constructive communication that takes place in peer groups could address the patients’ spiritual and mental needs (improving quality of life dimensions) thus allowing them to resume their normal professional, personal and social life at a faster pace.

Qualitative Study One

APA formatted reference should be written here

Provide an overview of the qualitative study.

Type of Study

Discuss the type of qualitative study that was performed. Note that qualitative studies look at the lived experience and do not have statistical analysis of data.

Credibility, Confirmability, Dependability, and Transferability

In this section you will discuss how researchers establish validity in qualitative research. This is different from the evaluation of quantitative research.

Credibility – believability and trustworthiness of the findings. Think of this as internal validity
Confirmability – describes how well the research finding are supported by the actual data collected
Dependability – refers to the consistency with which the results could be repeated. Did the researches document any changes or unexpected occurrences that might have affected their Think of this as reliability.
Transferability – the degree that the findings of the research can be transferred to other contexts. Can the information be applied to other similar settings, population or situations? Think of this as external validity

Applicability

Will this study be applicable to your project? Why or why not? Remember that you are not to be writing in first person.

Qualitative Study Two

APA formatted reference should be written here

Provide an overview of the qualitative study.

Type of Study

Discuss the type of qualitative study that was performed. Note that qualitative studies look at the lived experience and do not have statistical analysis of data.

Credibility, Confirmability, Dependability, and Transferability

In this section you will discuss how researchers establish validity in qualitative research. This is different from the evaluation of quantitative research.

Credibility – believability and trustworthiness of the findings. Think of this as internal validity
Confirmability – describes how well the research finding are supported by the actual data collected
Dependability – refers to the consistency with which the results could be repeated. Did the researches document any changes or unexpected occurrences that might have affected their Think of this as reliability.
Transferability – the degree tha the findings of the research can be transferred to other contexts. Can the information be applied to other similar settings, population or sitatuions? Think of this as external validity

Applicability

Will this study be applicable to your project? Why or why not? Remember that you are not to be writing in first person.

Ranking the Evidence

Quantitative Study I (author(s), year and title)

Utilizing the evidence hierarchy, discuss the type of research conducted and where it falls on the 8 level evidence hierarchy. Be specific. Is it level II evidence (RCT) or is it Level VIII (expert opinion) and what does this level indicate about the evidence? The pyramid can be found in the Module 8 lesson folder, figure 14-11.

Quantitative Study II (author(s), year and title)

Utilizing the evidence hierarchy, discuss the type of research conducted and where it falls on the 8 level evidence hierarchy. Be specific.

Qualitative Study I (author(s), year and title)

Utilizing the evidence hierarchy, discuss the type of research conducted and where it falls on the 8 level evidence hierarchy. Be specific.

Qualtitative Study II (author(s), year and title) Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper

Utilizing the evidence hierarchy, discuss the type of research conducted and where it falls on the 8 level evidence hierarchy. Be specific.

Strength of Evidence

Evaluate each article based on the GRADE criteria. Is the strength of the evidence very low, low, moderate or high? Analyze each article individually and then determine the overall strength of the evidence that you have gathered. The GRADE criteria article can be found in the Module 8 assignment folder.

Practice Recommendations

Based upon the research articles that you have reviewed, what are two practice recommendations that you would put into place?

Strength of Recommendations

Once you have decided what you would recommend, you should then evaluate each individual practice recommendation using the GRADE criteria and determine the overall strength of each recommendation.

Key Stakeholders

Who are three key stakeholders and why are they important to your project?

Engagement Strategies

How will you engage the stakeholders? What strategies will you use to get them to help you make your project a success? A workgroup? A committee?

Resistance Strategies

Resistance to change is a frequent occurrence. What can you do to help decrease resistance and improve the success of the project? What interventions can you put into place to improve participation?

Evaluation

How will you evaluate the results of your intervention? Be specific including methods used and timeframe.

References

Creswell, J. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

ORDER HERE

In an APA format paper, approximately 3-5 pages in length, address the following questions. (Please note that you will continue to write in the same document you completed for part 1 and 2 of this assignment (completed in modules 2 and 4) - you can keep the same cover page, correcting any errors noted on your previous feedback. Please correct your reference page as noted from your previous submission feedback and update it with your new material). In addition, although you are submitting your entire project to date (with revisions), your actual grade will be based only on the current section, as addressed below: Locate two different quantitative studies related to your topic of interest. For help locating the right types of quantitative research articles review these excellent tutorials: How to find quantitative research articles Research versus evidence based practice If you still need help locating quantitative research articles schedule a research appointment with a Rasmussen Librarian; view this tutorial which shows you how to schedule a research appointment. For each study, answer these questions: What is the study type? What threats to internal and external validity were noted? Are there others you think might be present that the author(s) didn\'t describe? Do you think this study will be applicable to your population? Why or why not? Quantitative Research Articles Essay Discussion Paper

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

ORDER HERE

Login

SING UP STAY TUNED!

Be the 1st to know about news and updates!

Be the 1st to know about
news and updates!