Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example Paper
Quantitative research and assessments are instrumental methods of collecting evidence and making concrete results in the field of nursing. Although these research and evaluations provide the researchers and readers with useful information, they also present some shortcomings. As such, readers should, at all times, be aware of these limitations when drawing information from quantitative extracts. A review of Sand Jeklin and K Sherman's article "Quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation" available in the Journal of Clinical Nursing is taken to find specific flaws and evaluate the reliability of quantitative research Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example Paper.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
This particular article appears to follow several of the credibility requirements outlined in the critique form's second page. The article matches the criteria for credibility since it is peer-reviewed. When a paper is peer-reviewed, it indicates other experts in the area have been consulted (Shaklee & Cousijn, 2015). This will almost certainly provide the correct facts and has an original viewpoint on the topic. Regarding the issue as to whether the authors of the article are professionals, it is clear that Sand Jeklin and Sherman are nursing experts. They are both professors at West Virginia University.
Although the article achieves most of the credibility standards, the usage of quasi-experimental correlations has several significant flaws in the design of the study. The usage of quasi-experimental raises specific tremendous challenges to the internal integrity of the research-gathered evidence (Punch, 2013). Internal validation challenges include unplanned occurrences that may happen during the research, biological and psychological changes that may occur on the participants, and mean regression (Punch, 2013). To overcome the flaws of the quasi-experimental approach, the authors should have used substitutes such as a cross-lagged panel model and causal modeling Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example Paper.
References
Punch, K. (2013). Validity in Quasi-Experimental Research. Routledge.
Sand‐Jecklin, K., & Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(19-20), 2854-2863.
Shaklee, P., & Cousijn, H. (2015). Can data be peer-reviewed. Retrieved from ELSEVIER: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/can-data-be-peer-reviewed.
When nurses have a question about a clinical practice issue that they can turn to the literature to see what scientific evidence is available that addresses their question. However, as discussed in Week 2, not all evidence is created equal. When looking at the literature, it is important to evaluate each research study. Before assumptions can be made about the applicability of a study\'s results, specific elements of a research design must be evaluated. This week, you will examine elements of the strength of a quantitative research study’s design, including sample size, generalizability, statistical analysis and conclusions. Keep in mind all studies have flaws or are not valid for your population. Consequently, one study by itself will not warrant a change in practice. It is important to find a number of studies to support your change in practice. To prepare for this Discussion, Review the following from this week’s resources: AWE Checklist (Level 4000) Discussion Rubric, provided in the Course Information area This week’s Writing Resources and Program Success Tools (link to e-guide) This week’s articles and media By Day 3 Post the following: After viewing the Week 3 Webinar: Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Research, complete the Appraisal Guide: Findings of a Quantitative Study in this week’s resources. Of the questions discussed on the second page of the critique form, titled Credibility, which ones were identified in the article reviewed during the webinar? Describe one of the most serious flaws in this study and why it leaves you wondering if the study findings should be used as evidence in an assessment of patient handoff? Note Initial Post: A three-paragraph (at least 350 words) response. Be sure to use evidence from the readings and include in-text citations. Utilize essay-level writing practice and skills, including the use of transitional material and organizational frames. Avoid quotes; paraphrase to incorporate evidence into your own writing. A reference list is required. Use the most current evidence (usually ≤ 5-years-old.) This is the webinar mentioned: https://mym.cdn.laureate-Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example Paper media.com/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/4100/CH/mm/quantitative-appraisal/index.html this is the Appraisal guide:Appraisal Guide: Findings of a Quantitative Study APA Formatted Citation: (4 pts.) Answer Here: Synopsis (16 pts.) 1. What was the purpose of the study (research questions, purposes, and hypotheses)? Answer Here: 2. How was the sample obtained? Answer Here: 3. What inclusion or exclusion criteria were used? Answer Here: 4. Who from the sample actually participated or contributed data (demographic or clinical profile and dropout rate)? Answer Here: 5. What methods were used to collect data (e.g., sequence, timing, types of data, and measures)? Answer Here: 6. Was an intervention tested? Answer Yes or No A. How was the sample size determined? Answer Here: B. Were patients randomly assigned to treatment groups? Answer Here: 7. What are the main findings of the study? (10 pts.) Answer Here: Credibility (14 pts.) Yes No Not Clear Is the study published in a source that required peer review? *Did the data obtained and the analysis conducted answer the research question? Were the measuring instruments reliable and valid? *Were important extraneous variables and bias controlled? *If an intervention was tested, answer the following five questions: Were participants randomly assigned to groups and were the two groups similar at the start (before the intervention)? Were the interventions well defined and consistently delivered? Were the groups treated equally other than the difference in interventions?
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
If no difference was found, was the sample size large enough to detect a difference if one existed? If a difference was found, are you confident it was due to the intervention? Are the findings consistent with findings from other studies? All Some No ARE THE FINDINGS CREDIBLE? Clinical Significance (6 pts.) 1. Note any difference in means, r2s, or measures of clinical effects (ABI, NNT, RR, OR) Answer Here: Yes No Not Clear *Is the target population clearly described? *Is the frequency, association, or treatment effect impressive enough for you to be confident that the finding would make a clinical difference if used as the basis for care? All Some No ARE THE FINDINGS CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT? *= Important criteria Common Flaws in Quantitative Studies Essay Example Paper